A word on my complaints

As chronicled in your researcher's journal as I researched my history of early lifestyles in South Asia...



I know, no one is perfect, and as I've mentioned here there are many fabulous archaeologists and historians working in South Asia. But the non-fabulous ones, especially those published by purportedly scholarly publishers, annoy me. I know how hard it is to do a decent job, but perhaps because I (most days!) work so hard on it I really find it annoying when someone else stops working far far short of a decent goal -- and some publisher thinks it's worthwhile to publish them.
Current time travel apparatus location: The Round Library, Bangalore, India

Another discarded secondary source

As chronicled in your researcher's journal as I researched my history of early lifestyles in South Asia...



Yikes. I hope my next secondary source offers something useful. The one I tried just now tries to say stuff about ancient India by using writings about ancient Sri Lanka from ancient Sri Lanka, completely ignoring the fact that they were separate entities (though of course by this time they were having some contact and mutual influence). The writer also had the audacity to reference some reliable sources that I happen to have in my library; when I checked the references, the reliable author was saying nothing of the sort. It's like writing "The planet Mars is 20 miles across" and referencing a specialized astronomy book on Mars which of course does not say that.

I've heard so many painfully polite, oblique references to the deplorable state of history in certain groups in India, and I'm seeing 'way too many examples of that.
Current time travel apparatus location: The Round Library, Bangalore, India

More secondary source problems

As chronicled in your researcher's journal as I researched my history of early lifestyles in South Asia...



OK, that's nice, Mr. History Guy. You're listing your sources, and they're primary sources. But you're abbreviating their names without a List of Abbreviations, and the abbreviations are ONE LETTER long. What is M? Manu? Mahabharata? Megasthenes? -- to name 3 of the extremely common sources for looking at some early South Asian thought. Or are they less common? Maitrayani Samhita? Mahaitareya? Mundakopanisad? The many Minor or Major Rock Edicts? Milandapanha? Manava Grihyasutra? Mahavastu? Mahaprajnaparamitashastra? Muduraikkanri? Malaipadukadam? Maitreyavyakarana? And those are just some of the sources starting with M in translation that I already used. Of course, I just would need to check those; hopefully one of them is what you mean. But really why be like this?

You see my problem.
Current time travel apparatus location: The Round Library, Bangalore, India

Be careful with Indian-published books

As chronicled in your researcher's journal as I researched my history of early lifestyles in South Asia...



Not again. I learned years ago that many Indian publishers -- including some highly respected ones -- put whatever the year is that they are PRINTING a book on what I would call their copyright page, even if it were really PUBLISHED a century or more earlier. Occasionally they'll just reprint the original, sometimes they'll slap in a new introduction. I always try to figure out the real date before buying a book, because in some areas scholarship really has progressed. Well, I just learned that a so-called 2004 book purporting to be from Oxford India was written in 1920! 1920! I know, it's just different front-copy norms, but when it specifically says "First published 2004" as well as "Copyright 2004" on the copyright page, I expect the book to be 2004-ish, not something I could quite frankly get free on the internet, and which much worse is far behind in its scholarship. The introduction was done in 2004, but even the introduction's author's contribution to the work was written in 1991 and published elsewhere. That's a long while ago in this particular field, unless all one is interested in is the history of history. Please, Messrs. Publishers, consider saying things like "an historical collection" or "an historical work on x" and mentioning dates on earlier works in your front matter, like the permissions you would surely need for some of your reprints -- hey, I've never seen permissions in these books either....I never ran across this in America. Could it possibly be connected to some very different idea in India, which has had such terrible problems with international piracy stuff? The no-permission-mentioned is highly suspicious to me.

Sorry I'm sounding like such a dreadful curmudgeon these days! So many secondary sources do this to me! But others make me very happy...

PS -- I asked a friend of mine who worked for Oxford University Press in New York, and he pointed out a VERY important point -- how do I know Oxford India books I'm getting aren't pirated? I don't even look at obviously pirated books being sold on city streets, but still....That would explain a lot of the breathtaking typographical problems too. Some Oxford India books I've bought -- AT A DIFFERENT STORE than these with problems (Landmark is the good store) -- are fabulous, such as the very talented Patrick and Suman Olivelle's translations of Manu and of major Dharmasutras. Though I do notice they typeset their own books!!
Current time travel apparatus location: The Round Library, Bangalore, India

Of different cultures

From an hilarious article "Why I Would Make a Perfect Alien Liaison" at http://www.wired.com/underwire/2010/10/alt-text-alien-liaison/ .

"I am nonjudgmental and not inclined to make assumptions. For instance, if aliens descend upon the planet, incinerating the trees and crops with a wave of fire before sending out screeching flying drones to pluck people from the streets and drag them off to labor in the mercury mines of Pluto and the plutonium mines of Mercury, I will consider the possibility that it’s what their culture considers a ceremonial message of peace."

...I often said when I lived immersed in a violent culture -- hmm, and now when I am immersed in a country with an evil "leader" -- that culture is not always neutral as I was taught by some, that it can be evil...

Hotel fun in the 1930s plus...

...was had by reading the delightfully designed, written, and of course illustrated book by Barry Zaid, Wish You Were Here: A Tour of America's Great Hotels During the Golden Age of the Picture Post Card. Most I enjoyed were from the 1930s, though it goes into the 1950s...



By the way, Mr. (Dr. perhaps) Zaid's degrees are in ARCHAEOLOGY and architecture and literature!! No wonder I love his work! Wow, and he lived in Pondicherry at one point, a beautiful-in-many-places though very challenging-to-live-in city.